Google is being sued by the Republican National Committee for email spam filters.

The RNC has filed a suit against Google, asserting that the company has suppressed its email solicitations ahead of the November midterm elections, which Google denies.

The lawsuit, filed Friday evening in the District Court for the Eastern District of California, did accuse Gmail of “discriminating” against the RNC by sending the organization’s email messages to users’ spam folders, affecting both fundraising and also efforts in key swing states.

“Enough is enough. We are suing Google for their obvious bias towards Republicans,” RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel told The Associated Press in a statement. “Google has sent critical end-of-month Republican GOTV as well as fundraising email messages to spam for ten months in a row with no clarification.” We are determined to put an end to it.

Google refuted the claims in a statement. “As we’ve said before, we don’t filter emails due to their political affiliation. “Gmail’s spam filters mirror users’ actions,” said company spokesperson José Castaeda, adding that the organization offers campaign training as well as guidelines and works to “maximize email deliverability whilst also minimizing unwanted spam.”

The lawsuit concentrates on how Google’s Gmail, the world’s largest email provider with approximately 1.5 billion users, screens invitations as well as other material to help users avoid being flooded with junk mail.

To attempt to filter material that account owners may not want in their inboxes, Google as well as other major email providers develop programs that flag conversations that are likely to be perceived as unwanted and move them to spam folders, which are rarely, if ever, accessed.

According to the lawsuit, Google has “massively banished millions of RNC email messages to prospective donors’ as well as loyalists’ spam folders all through pivotal points in election fundraising and community building,” particularly at the end of the month, when political groups prefer to send more messages.

“It makes no difference whether the email is just about donating, voting, or even community service. “It also makes no difference if the emails are delivered to people who sought them,” it says.

Google claims that its algorithms are impartial, but a March study by North Carolina State University observed that Gmail was significantly more likely to filter messages from conservative causes.

Premised on emails sent during the 2020 election campaign in the United States, the study estimated that Gmail delivered roughly 10% and 77% of all email from left-wing candidates into spam folders and marked as spam respectively.

According to the study, Gmail competitors Yahoo as well as Microsoft’s Outlook were much more likely to favor conservative cause pitches than Gmail.

In April, the Republican National Committee used that study to ask the Federal Election Commission to look into Google’s “censure” of its fundraising efforts, which it claimed added up to an in-kind commitment to Democratic candidates and served as “a financially catastrophic example of Silicon Valley tech companies unjustly influencing the political playing field to advantage their ideal far-left candidates.”

Ever since, the commission has endorsed a pilot program that allows political committees to bypass spam filters and deliver fundraising emails to recipients’ primary inboxes. Gmail participates in the “Verified Sender Program,” which enables senders to circumvent traditional spam filters while also allowing users to unsubscribe from a sender.

If a recipient clicks the unsubscribe button, the sender is expected to remove that Gmail address from their mailing lists. The RNC had not signed up to take part in pilot program as of Friday evening.

Republicans who have attempted to cast suspicion on the results of the 2020 presidential election without repeating the most severe as well as completely unfounded claims about tainted electronic voting and stolen votes have frequently blamed large tech firms such as Facebook and Twitter which they claim are prejudiced against former President Donald Trump.

There is no proof of the mass fraud Trump claims, according to a lengthy list of local and state election officials, courts, as well as members of Trump’s own administration.